[60] - [Voice]
Jun. 30th, 2011 11:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
doctor_j_craneFor reasons totally unrelated to the recent flood, I've recently turned my mind to the issue of barge romantic relationships. [Crane sounds awkward just saying it.] Frankly, I'm confused as to why anyone could ever think that it ever would work out. Ignoring numerous public examples of messy arguments between wardens and inmates alike, I've never in my experience heard of a prison being described as a good dating environment. While the inmates do obviously suffer a certain lack of options, it's the wardens that persist in romantic liaisons that surprise me.
How can your supposed relationships have real meaning if they have an expiration date date? Or would you be willing to give up your family, friends and universe for one person who seemed like a good option while you were in a prison? You can believe me when I say that it isn't only unrealistic, it's unhealthy. It's no more valuable than a relationship forged in a war zone, done by the same messy necessity and a certain need to settle for what is available, no matter how substandard. It's disturbing how easily you all seem to give in to the delusion that it means something. It doesn't. It just has that sliver more meaning than the rest of your pointless existence on the barge. Furthermore, it's a disservice to your inmates and not to mention a failure in your duties as wardens. You're not here to find meaningful relationships with each other. You're supposed to be helping us.
[Pause. Crane sounds slightly more amused.] I hadn't done this in a while. It's highly therapeutic for me to tell you all the ways that you're wrong. I recommend it highly to other inmates.
[Private- Edward Nygma]
It could be slightly related to the flood. [The longest pause.] I'm not sure that I want to talk about it. I do apologize though.
[OOC: Whoops, going to do that post and run thing. Will be back in eight hours, after sleep. <3]
How can your supposed relationships have real meaning if they have an expiration date date? Or would you be willing to give up your family, friends and universe for one person who seemed like a good option while you were in a prison? You can believe me when I say that it isn't only unrealistic, it's unhealthy. It's no more valuable than a relationship forged in a war zone, done by the same messy necessity and a certain need to settle for what is available, no matter how substandard. It's disturbing how easily you all seem to give in to the delusion that it means something. It doesn't. It just has that sliver more meaning than the rest of your pointless existence on the barge. Furthermore, it's a disservice to your inmates and not to mention a failure in your duties as wardens. You're not here to find meaningful relationships with each other. You're supposed to be helping us.
[Pause. Crane sounds slightly more amused.] I hadn't done this in a while. It's highly therapeutic for me to tell you all the ways that you're wrong. I recommend it highly to other inmates.
[Private- Edward Nygma]
It could be slightly related to the flood. [The longest pause.] I'm not sure that I want to talk about it. I do apologize though.
[OOC: Whoops, going to do that post and run thing. Will be back in eight hours, after sleep. <3]
Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:11 am (UTC)It harms the wardens inmate. Our one-on-one system suggests that a warden primary responsibility, focus and energy should be dedicated to their inmate. The Admiral doesn't give people rewards for nothing. As soon as you bring a relationship into the question, the warden has other priorities that were never in their job description.
Private- He should be. Iago might actually consent to be...truthful. .......or not. XP
Date: 2011-07-01 01:12 am (UTC)[ Private | Video ] - Oooh! I knew I missed one when firefox ate my old tags. Thanks bb. <3
Date: 2011-07-01 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:17 am (UTC)That may be true, but it seems unreasonable to dismiss my concerns solely based on that. Once I posted a video of Perry Dawsey murdering Rex Lewis. That would probably be construed as "trolling". But no one ignored the content in that.
Private;
Date: 2011-07-01 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:20 am (UTC)[Private]
Who else is it? Generally. I don't expect you to name names.
Why are they so absurd? They're abuses of power that could actually occur on the barge.
private
Date: 2011-07-01 01:22 am (UTC)I'm aware of that, and the idea of them isn't absurd - but I find them so when I know for a fact I'd never dream of either.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 01:23 am (UTC)And you could say that about any job, but people manage to be married and hold down jobs all the time.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 04:26 am (UTC)[Private]
Date: 2011-07-01 06:19 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2011-07-01 06:19 am (UTC)[Private]
Date: 2011-07-01 08:15 am (UTC)private;
Date: 2011-07-01 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-01 09:54 am (UTC)[ Private | Video ] - Heh, no prob, it's not an important one anyway, just for fun. ^_^
Date: 2011-07-01 11:37 am (UTC)private; oh, ps. 'expiry' is not an american term. xD
Date: 2011-07-01 06:46 pm (UTC)You're right! Yeah, no. I guess I must have misread it. [Sounds suspiciously like avoidance.]
[Private]
Date: 2011-07-01 07:23 pm (UTC)[Private]
Date: 2011-07-02 10:28 am (UTC)private; Thanks bb! /changes to 'use by'. Which hopefully is? D:
Date: 2011-07-02 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-02 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-02 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-02 10:43 am (UTC)